"P. J. Alling" wrote: > > The DL has a nice bright viewfinder but based on my, (admittedly short > tome), observation somewhat lower contrast than the DS making manual > focusing a bit more difficult. The shot buffer in the DS is much larger > with a resulting faster response for the second third and even fourth > shot in a series. > someone else wrote me off list encouraging me to get the DS instead of the DL I have to check it out in person but I gather I can get them for about the same price.
Thanks, Peter ann > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > >Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > >>Ann, > >> > >>Consider a DL or, better yet, a good, used DS, use your manual Pentax glass > >>on it just as you would an older manual camera. I paid $410.00 for my > >>current DS, used, and in beautiful condition from KEH. I mostly have > >>K-mount lenses, and they work very well with the DS, and I suppose with a > >>DL as well. Bada Bing - a minimal learning curve. > >> > >>Shel > >> > >> > > > > > >What is the "better yet" aspect of the DS over the DL , > >Shel? > >are you talking about $410 just for the body? > > > >ann > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>[Original Message] > >>>From: Ann Sanfedele > >>> > >>> > >>>Do I want a DL? if not, why not? > >>> > >>>The Pentax glass I have left are only manual lenses - > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>[email protected] > >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > When you're worried or in doubt, > Run in circles, (scream and shout). > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
