skye wrote: > > On 6/22/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No ad on your folder, plus one ad on top of each of the four photos I > looked at. However, much less wait on your photos (thanks for that, > although you probably did it because of your modem limits more than > for li'l old me).
No, not for my modem limits - I did do it so they would load faster when viewed no matter where or what you are using. And to keep the files on my hard drive small so I can leave them there. But an ad on top of the large view?? Oh no! .... that didnt use to be and I'm paying them for the space - that's annoying - although the ad for Aperture isnt moving at least. (I just went and looked) This didn't always happen and I dont look at my own stuff much except when I'm first listing it. It seems to me they shouldn't be doing ads on top of anyones stuff if we are paying them for the space ($25 a year for 100 mgs of which I've only used about 5) > It's no big deal, I'm not going to call photo.net a bad name or > boycott them. I Am calling them a bad name... I just wanted to point out that for my own self, I find > ads more distracting than anything else on the planet, aside from > blink tags. Still, I keep trucking along. The photo's the most > important thing and I feel lucky to see yours. Thanks, skye > > Thanks for your concern though, > > -- skye > Thanks for telling me - I hate ads on line - which is why I never read email on line. I long for the days when you could surf for information in plain text if you wanted to do so. sigh. ann > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
