On Jun 22, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > The advantage to shooting a small, lo-res PUG image digitally is that > you can do it in a matter of minutes. As I said in the first place.
If I were shooting exclusively for the PUG, that would be just fine. But as I said in my post, I do not have time to shoot anything exclusively for the PUG, and if I am creating new material why would I want to cripple it in that way from the outset? My primary venue for displaying my work is not the internet. I really can't see what's so hard to understand about this -- it's not malicious and it's not evil. The PUG just isn't do-able for me. I was asked to submit, and I apologized and said I am not going to. That's the end of it, Paul -- no amount of lawyering with words will make it suddenly sensible for me to change the way I make photographs so that my regular work suffers but it's more appropriate for posting to the PUG. I'm not going to prioritize the PUG over making a living. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
