(As a flickr user), the only problem that I had with the flickr group
gallery was that there was no way to separate the themes. It's just
all in one lump. I try not to complain without a solution so: My
suggestion is: It would be nice if, after the deadline of the theme
passes, someone (moderator) would upload a "photo" containing the text
of that theme to "cap it off" so to speak. For example, at the end of
June, you could post a photo that has black text "June: Tall Height"
on a white background. After than you can commence with the next
theme's photo submissions.

On 6/21/06, Michael Christian Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a tip of my hat to Tom and John's recent comments, I'm not sure what
> the next incarnation of PUG's gallery should be, but I did try something
> recently that might be set an example of a plausible way to proceed using
> free photo tools on the net. Specifically Flickr, which doesn't cost
> anything, has no size limitations, and submissions to groups can be
> moderated by group leaders (to trim out the weeds, so to speak). I figure
> it's better to use free resources than put the burden of responsibility on a
> few people.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/groups/ok1000/
>
> A few weeks ago I started this Flickr group to allow Flickr Pentax users to
> post themed pictures to a showcase gallery, to see how it would go. It's not
> much right now, but then I didn't expect it to be popular and I'm surprised
> there are even as many people in the group as there are right now.
>
> Any Flickr account holder can select to join the group, and then they can
> select images from their personal gallery to be submitted to the group's
> gallery. It works pretty easily. At any time, a user can pull their images
> from the gallery or add new ones. They're shown in order of submission, not
> date taken or uploaded to Flickr. On top of this, there are discussion
> threads that can be extraneous to the comments for photos (as some people
> don't allow comments under there photos).
>
> Uploading images to your personal gallery at Flickr is fairly
> straightforward, although there are upload bandwidth caps for free accounts
> (20MB a month).  But no download caps. This alone makes it pretty attractive
> to me. At for copyright, Flickr is good at displaying what reservations you
> keep about sharing the image, and inhibiting copying as best they can.
>
> If someone wanted to moderate a new group, they could then post a discussion
> thread at the Flickr group's webpage highlighting a winner and runners up
> after they'd counted votes. Voting could be done in the comments for each
> picture (a requisite would be to allow comments for these photos), and
> because dates are shown for the comments.
>
> Just thought I'd put it out there for you guys to consider if you're not
> into Flickr. Hey, and if you are at Flickr.
>
> - Michael
>
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to