I guess so and I guess so...
Tom C. >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Digital Camera Blocking Technology >Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:40:12 -0700 > >You completely misread the humor in my intent. Explaining it is a >waste of time. > >G > >On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > *You're* reaction is more of "the sky is falling". > > > > My post neither had that tone nor was meant to imply that tone. > > Nor am I > > worried about not being able to use a digital camera. > > Nevertheless, I found > > the article interesting and my response was tongue-in-cheek, along > > the lines > > of an anti-anti-missle-missile. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Digital Camera Blocking Technology > >> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:47:47 -0700 > >> > >> This nonsense has been emailed around several times already. > >> The Sky Is Faling! Film Is Essential! > >> > >> Now what's that thing that PJ has as his signature? > >> > >> "If you're troubled or in doubt > >> run in circles, scream and shout!" > >> > >> G > >> > >> On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Tom C wrote: > >> > >>> A digital camera detector blocker is in order... or maybe just film. > >>> http://upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060619-062742-6349r > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
