Hi John, I'm not convinced yet that it's cheaper, or that the additional cost and time spent learning will produce results sufficiently better than film to justify the time & money.
In fact, the increased posting rate is not only caused by me having a digital camera. I have recently caught up with a backlog of processing, and I have also been shooting more film simply because I have been more inclined to photography recently than over the past couple of years. -- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Forbes > Sent: 20 June 2006 18:45 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The Middle-aged Man and the Sea > > Well, one thing digital has done for you is that it has got > you posting > pictures. And, dare I say, taking them? > > But the other things are that it's much cheaper (provided you > take plenty > of pictures), much more convenient (once you've learned all > about digital > processing and using PS), and offers you much more control > (assuming you > use colour). > > That's the three Cs of digital: cost, convenience, control. > > John -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
