On 20.06.06, at 19:02 , Lon Williamson wrote: > I've read with interest what PDMLers say about Pentax antishake, > but I remember reading, I think on DPreveiw, about the Optio A10 > where antishake results were inconsistent. Mind, many think those > folks have a bias against Pentax. I would guess the DLSRs that are > a' coming would have better implementations. I'm not gonna consider > them until I hear the "early adopters" here (and thank goodness we > have > some) post THEIR reports HERE.
A10 has completely different SR mechanism than the one in K100D. In A10 sensor is moved using microstepping motors, while in K100D it is moved be electromagnetic field - guess which one is more responsive? ;-) -- Best regards Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
