>Interesting that you are not suggesting the 28-105/3.2-4.5 AL; I >thought you had a high opinion of it.
It's a good lens but I didn't think it met shel's req's. G
>Interesting that you are not suggesting the 28-105/3.2-4.5 AL; I >thought you had a high opinion of it.
It's a good lens but I didn't think it met shel's req's. G