The author of the test didn't say that. In fact, he scanned the 6x6 at
a fairly high resolution.
On May 5, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Well, no -- because they threw away detail from the 6x6 scan to make
the resolutions equivalent, destroying the comparison.
-Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Fw: Analog versus Digital Shootout
Date: Fri May 5, 2006 12:02 pm
Size: 605 bytes
To: [email protected]
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Christian wrote:
William Robb wrote:
For your enjoyment. I'm just the messenger......
William Robb
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Schneider" Subject: Analog
versus
Digital Shootout
http://www.ales.litomisky.com/shootout/
analogversusdigitalshootout.htm
At the risk of sounding more dumb than usual.... What is the point in
comparing 20x30 inch 240dpi prints and then showing crappy jpegs on a
website?
Assuming that they were all done in the same way, this does not affect
the outcome of the comparison, does it?
Kostas
