On May 5, 2006, at 1:00 AM, graywolf wrote:
Intent.
I think you're right -- note also that he has thrown away two thirds of the data from the drum scan. I'm going to do that with the scan I put up for a comparison.
http://aaronreynolds.ca/albums/PDML/back_stairs_RVP_resized_chu.jpg Doesn't look anything like the crap they put up.I don't know why one would want to drop to 240 dpi at print size before comparing the prints, unless one wanted the print with more data to look worse.
-Aaronx
