I have a D and after Godfreys' comments (which I agree on) I'd say, to be simple: * Is CF card a problem? (nex Pentax will be SD only it seems) * Is FPS important? * Is screen size important?
If answers to these questions are mostly negative, then go on for the D, you won't regret it. It has much more htan the others IMO ;) Just my 2 cents of course. 2006/4/24, João Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Gentlemen > I think it is the right time for me to move from my > ZX-5n to digital. > I have made some researches and, after I saw Dario's > homepage, I became a little concerned on the sharpness > of the *ist D. Is it really unsharp? If so, is it > something Photoshop can fix (I mean, do you always > have to use Photoshop to fix the sharpness of all your > photos)? By how many points (in average)? > And what about the colour rendition? It is completely > different from the *ist D to the Fujifilm and the > Cannon cameras. Which one delivers the right colour? > Another question: is the *ist D worth the $600.00 over > the *ist DL? What are the extra features? > Thanks in advance > Joao > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail: 1GB de espaço, alertas de e-mail no celular e > anti-spam realmente eficaz. > http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/ > > -- ---------------------- Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
