Makes sense to me. Obviously you would have moved it if you didn't want
it in the shot. I thought of that right after I hit the send button:-)
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Paul Stenquist suggested that I clone out the third shoe, the one in
the
upper LH corner. I didn't read the comment on the list, but, rather
in the
archive.
Paul, had I not wanted that shoe exactly where it is, it would have
been
easy enough to move it. However, I like where it is, I think it adds
to
the composition, and a little bit to the story, which is not obvious.
HJowever, I can see your point about it not being there as well, it's
just
a different take on the subject.
Shel
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/shoes.html
