Pål Jensen wrote:
Paul wrote:
Glass half full interpretation:
Now there is only Hasselblad to compete against in the MF digital
niche. A
smaller company can survive quite happily with a small percentage of the
overall market. Look at Apple who have had 3-5% of the PC market for
years.
Even pre iPod (but post iMac) they were doing quite well with this small
fraction. Pentax have always been a "think different" kind of company
and
probably just need one "cult" camera to survive.
...but 3-5% of the PC market is still huge and will benefit from
volume production. The market share digital backs enjoyed by
Hasselblad is miniscule and will probably collapse completely the
moment sensor prices drops
Wow, you're really obsessed with Hassie dying. I absolutely hate to
say it, but Pentax seems more at risk- they're being chased into lower
and lower margins by the market leader (makes for great ist Dx prices
though) and they don't have any MF cameras that are used commercially.
Except for a few artists, commercial MF is digital. Period. No one is
going to migrate back to the once-great, "but I got burned on the
digital transition" 645 and 67 lines.
Sensor prices aren't going to plummet like Moore's law- die sizes have
stayed the same now for a long time. Smaller transistors don't make
bigger or better sensors. Sure, they'll get 2x as cheap, 3x, but not
magnitude after magnitude... and besides, this helps those who decouple
the back from the camera more anyway.
-Ryan
-Ryan
And why
- Re: Mamiya is history Ryan K. Brooks
-