Bob Shell wrote: >On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote: > >> Mark Roberts wrote: >> >>> Bob Shell wrote: >>>>> Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant. >>>>> On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato", >>>>>> since I >>>>>> strongly suspected that :-) >>>> >>>> You know, saying "largely it is not potato" probably should be >>>> "for the most part, it is not potato". That would imply that >>>> some part of it is, indeed, potato. >>> They're probably saying this because they expect this camera to have >>> appeal. >>> >> >> You're in for a roasting now..... > >Should I chip in again?
Eye!
