Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:02 PM, Gonz wrote:
Here with the 16-45:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/IMGP6414.jpg
Here with the 12-24:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/IMGP6415.jpg
Not exactly a fair test ... zooms are generally at their worst at the
focal length limits and at their best in the middle of the range, here
you've got the 16-45 at its wide limit and the 12-24 right in the
middle of its range.
But judging by these two pictures, the 16-45 has a heck of a problem at
corners and edges. The 12-24 renders much better results.
Godfrey
I'm just supplying the man with what he wanted... to wit:
With that in mind, I'm trying to take the opportunity to re-evaluate my
lens situation. In short, the question is: should I get a new 16-45 or the
12-24mm? More specifically, my main question is how do the two compare at
16mm? I'm not sure if any one can answer this besides Paul (he came up on
just about every search in the archives), but any feedback will be
appreciated.
