It came out as an exaggeration, yes. My intention was not to hurt anybody's feelings. So let me rephrase it: Those on the list, who took part in it, were attacking him because of something he never actually said.
It was pretty typical; it is in the nature of the media. A thing gets out of context, and thereby out proportions. That was my point. One more thing, and this is far more important. This is for everybody who has taken part in this thread: I apologise for turning at you folks because you didn't give me exactly the advice I wanted. The explanation is simple, I am frustrated because several hours reading up on the subject, and more hours spent in the field, does not provide results. But that's no reason to shout at you folks. The advice you have been giving me, on getting closer, is probably the most sensible thing to do. I'll be working on it, doing whatever it takes, as long as it does not get my equipment wet. This said; I _also_ need to improve my cropping skill ;-) Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13. april 2006 04:17 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Composing on screen vs. in viewfinder. > > An incredible exaggeration :-( > greetings > Markus - which seems not to be part of the list then > > >>I don't want to end up in the position Aaron had in the RAW file thread > a > >>few days ago, where the whole list was attacking him because of > >>something he > >>never actually said. > >> > >> > >>Tim >
