Quoting Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
No, I wouldn't say that I have no hot or dead pixels -- someone
previously said that the camera's software knows where these pixels
are and compensates in some way. However, I do not get these spots
like what you saw in the link I put up previously. Knowing now that
these are sensor defects, if that were my camera I would have
returned it as unacceptable -- there are probably a dozen.
To late for me now.:-(
The whole point of shooting digital, for me, is faster turnaround.
Why should I expect to spend time in post for this? It's also the
same reason I'm not shooting RAW -- if I want to spend time
afterwards to work on the photographs, I'll shoot 6x7 and scan it and
get a better result.
But even in casual use, those spots were all over Dave Brooks' D
(sorry Dave).
Sniff, Sniff, its ok. It may be that i never saw them due to the type
of shots i taking. Lots of sky and clounds in the pictures. Coarse i
was not looking for them.:-(
I have the D200 now. I'll check and see what it looks like. I have till
Saturday for full return.
Dave
I have not yet seen a single image with these spots out of my DS2
(going on 5000 images).
Could this simply be improved software on the camera?
Could be. There were a lot of complaints on the first camera FWIR.
Dave
-Aaron
Equine Photography in York Region
