> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 April 2006 13:08 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part > 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > Not change # in headline. > > This is as ugly, ass can be. > This list _is_ the dark side ;-) > > Seriously. Isn't it "real English" to use anals as short for analects? > My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. >
It sounds as though it was looking up anal. Perhaps it should have looked up annal instead! Bob
