Well, DL was not supposed to replace the DS. DL is just a lower spec DS. Good or bad i don't know but it is logical something is missing on the DL compared to the DS and DL being a more "coming from bridge" type of camera I guess the middle user buying a DL shouldn't be bothered by the lack of plain TTL.
Now, for us looking for a cheap body, it is PITA I confess. On 4/1/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, P-TTL. > > My point is that, before exploring the nuances of TTL vs.P-TTL, one needs a > reliable system. > The D only gets that with the Sigma DG (P-TTL). > The DS gets that with any TTL/P-TTL flash I've tried so far, old & new. > > That's a big improvement IMO, too quickly thrown away with the DL. > > Dario > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:34 PM > Subject: Re: DL TTL flash madness > > > > On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote: > > > >> At the end of the day, I'm afraid that the only TTL flash working well on > >> the D to be the Sigma EF500 DG. > > > > And that's P-TTL, right? Or are you saying that it has a TTL mode and it > > works well on the -D? > > > > Kostas > > > > -- ---------------------- Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
