I prefer the first one 'worse'. =) Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. I offer a blanket apology to the list + a standing invitation to > drop > by and stay an evening or two on your way through. > > Tom C. > > > > > >From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: PESO - Dawn's Early Light > >Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:35:21 -0600 > > > >This is what you see when you get up in the morning? > >We all hate you!!! ;-) > >Regards, Bob S. > > > >On 3/3/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Taken this morning outside the front door. I should mention that > I was > >the > > > only one up yet. I saw the light from the upstairs bathroom > window upon > > > stepping out of the shower. I ran 'au naturel' out to the car, > got the > > > camera, changed lenses and took several shots. I thought that > would add > >a > > > little to the image. ;-) > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4181984&size=lg > > > > > > > > > > > > The other version which was the one I failed to convert the > profile on > >is > > > here: > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4181617&size=lg > > > > > > I hope not to hear Jack Davis say he prefers the second one > better. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: [email protected] > > > >To: [email protected] > > > >Subject: Re: Web vs. Photoshop Colors > > > >Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:48:28 -0700 > > > > > > > >Thanks everyone. I got it fixed thanks to your kind assistance. > > > > > > > >1) I still don't have a clear understanding of it though. I had > gone > >to > > > >the <Color Settings> dialog on the Edit menu. It pops up and in > the > > > >Working Space RGB field it says sRGB IEC61966-2.1. Seeing that, > I > >thought > > > >the image *already was* in sRGB, and I was using Save for Web as > usual. > > > > > > > >2) However, when I went to <Convert to Profile> on the Edit > menu, the > > > >Source Space was Adobe RGB. Setting the destination space to > sRGB > > > >(converting to) and then using Save to Web corrected the > problem. > > > > > > > >So now I ask (and I'm sure this has been mentioned here before > or I > >could > > > >look it up), what is it really telling me under <Color Settings> > when > >it > > > >says the working space is sRGB? > > > > > > > >I'm also amazed at how little difference it has made in other > images, > >not > > > >doing the Convert to Profile step. > > > > > > > >Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>Reply-To: [email protected] > > > >>To: [email protected] > > > >>Subject: Re: Web vs. Photoshop Colors > > > >>Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:06:50 -0500 > > > >> > > > >>As Ryan said, make sure the color space is sRGB. Then, if > you're using > > > >>PhotoShop do a Save for Web. It should come up on the Save for > Web > >page > > > >>looking the same as your sRGB but all exif data and color space > info > >will > > > >>be stripped. That should avoid any confusion when you put it up > on the > > > >>web. > > > >>Paul > > > >>On Mar 3, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>Tom C wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>>I've been this route before... aargh. > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>Convert to profile sRGB, that'll expand or reduce your working > gamut > >into > > > >>>the web gamut and it should be exactly the same in appearance. > Don't > > > >>>bother embedding a profile in the web image, it is assumed > sRGB and > >may > > > >>>be ignored. > > > >>> > > > >>>-Ryan > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
