While I detected no keen interest in the content of the Kodak response,
I'm going to forward a bit of the text for whomever:

"The new Pentax D645 sensor (KAF 18000CE @ 18.6m total pixels)
leverages Kodak's 9-micron pixel design and color technology,image
quality, senssitivity, dynamic range and color fidelity ..bla..bla.." 
"duel-output architecture enables faster sensor read-out and permits
faster frame rates".
"A 16mp (KAF-16802CE) has been designed at a square 1:1 aspect ratio as
well as a 22mp (KAF-22000CE) for the traditional commercial and studio
photography market".
In a subsequent paragraph, they added the phrase, "Kodak develops,
manufactures and markets both CCD and CMOS image sensors for digital
camera applications".
I can check for any info you may wonder about if found, and do a
two-finger answer.

Jack

--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It may be a good idea to set file associations so that Acrobat and
> not
> Photoshop opens PDF files, then there would be no need to open
> Acrobat
> first.
> 
> Shel
> 
> 
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Gautam Sarup
> 
> > The strangeness may be because perhaps you installed
> > Acrobat Reader and installed Photoshop after that.
> >
> > To see the file better start Acrobat and open the pdf file
> > from the application - File - Open - select the file you want.
> 
> 
> >    Jack Davis <> wrote:
> > > This may be well known and discussed at length, but I'll pass
> along for
> > > whatever interest there may be.
> > > I emailed Kodak and asked if their KAF 10010 sensor was to used
> in the
> > > newly announced 10mp DSLR from Pentax. Kodak explained that they
> were
> > > precluded from giving out such information prior the the
> customer's
> > > having made it public.
> > > They did send along a strange pdf message that opened in my
> Photoshop.
> > > Nothing like I'd ever received. It consisted of a panel showing
> three
> > > tiny thumbnail size pages of info about their 18mp KAF 10010
> being used
> > > in the Pentax D645.
> > > Extremely difficult to read the message as it's an overlay on a
> > > herringbone pattern such as one would see if an element were
> lifted
> > > from a background.(?) I soon gave up the attempt.
> > > Their email refused to be forwarded, even off-line.
> > > Any idea you might have as to how to utilize this message, let me
> know.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to