I bought it direct from Amplis, the Canadian distributor, in volume. I can get 
you contact info if you want.

-Aaron

-----Original Message-----

From:  Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  Re: thots on printing and prints
Date:  Fri Mar 3, 2006 11:03 am
Size:  4K
To:  [email protected]

Aaron,

Where do you get it locally? I've seen prints on it, but due to a lack 
of source, haven't had a chance to see my prints on it, and I really 
want to.

-Adam




Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> I have a really nice monitor and I agree -- even prints made on my "old" 7500 
> knock the socks off of looking at the monitor.
> 
> I also second Adam's recommendation of the Hahnemühle photo rag, a gorgeous 
> paper.  All my b&w Trinidad 24 x 36s were printed on that stuff.
> 
> I still don't know what I'm doing for my show in May (I've been distracted, 
> doing other people's shows for May, which is the big Contact photography 
> month here in Toronto), but chances are it'll be on that paper.
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From:  Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj:  thots on printing and prints
> Date:  Fri Mar 3, 2006 10:13 am
> Size:  3K
> To:  SeePhoto Camera Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,   PDML 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> Getting ready for the exhibition, I've been printing up a storm the  
> past week or two.
> 
> The HP 7960 has done yeoman service to print announcement postcards  
> (for the hundred or so I need, it's cheaper than I've found as yet to  
> print decent quality color at a print service), business cards,  
> exhibit tags, all manner of collateral things. I'm surprised at the  
> quality I'm getting out of it as well as the economy ... I've hardly  
> touched the two color cartridges, barely touched the black ink tank,  
> and used about 1/2 of a grayscale cart to output everything so far.
> 
> It's operated flawlessly and quickly. The only hitch I've encountered  
> so far has been the juggling of paper due to the u-turn paper path,  
> particularly for the announcement post cards. I've been unsuccessful  
> at making a custom paper size that would print the cards in one run,  
> so each sheet (two cards per sheet) gets run through two times to  
> print the addressing information on upper and lower cards, and then  
> once again to print the announcement on both.
> 
> The Epson R2400 is making the final presentation prints. It also has  
> operated flawlessly and with extreme consistency. I've consumed one  
> whole set of ink carts in the making of perhaps 160 prints from 5x7  
> to A3 in size. I'm very glad I bought this printer.
> 
> I did some testing with Fine Art Velvet vs Epson Enhanced Matte  
> papers. There's no question whatever that the Fine Art Velvet is a  
> nicer paper, producing a more brilliant result, but I found that with  
> suitable minor adjustments to the tonal curve I can produce results  
> that are so nearly as good on Epson Enhanced Matte, once you put both  
> behind glass with a matte, that I am producing the show prints on  
> EEM. (My plan is to provide Fine Art Velvet prints on orders rather  
> than for the exhibit itself.)
> 
> This allows me to use automation more effectively since I can stack  
> load the printer for the show prints and reduces production costs  
> substantially. I wrote actions for Photoshop which automate printing  
> three different sizes of prints for the whole set. I must be getting  
> lightheaded at having this stuff come out because I'm getting a  
> thrill out of seeing a very nice, fully finished stack of 20 custom- 
> cut 5x7s pop out of the printer in a half hour or so.
> 
> I produced three sets like this so far and have been using one of  
> them to help organize and arrange the photos. And let me tell you,  
> there is such a huge difference between looking at a nice print and  
> looking at a photo on even an excellent computer screen. The tactile  
> qualities of the paper, the micro interaction of the surface texture  
> with the ink and image, the dynamics of handling the print ...  
> Although I love looking at photographs on a good computer screen,  
> there's simply nothing like a good print. And an modest size print,  
> something in the 5x7 to 11x14 range, is a much more intimate viewing  
> experience than the big ones too.
> 
> fun stuff. I'm in the bomb run now, waiting for the clouds to clear.  
> There's a lot of work yet to do before Sunday when I do the  
> installation, but it's all getting done in an efficient manner  
> without rushing. This is fun.
> 
> Godfrey
>    - "Ramsey" - http://www.gdgphoto.com
> 


Reply via email to