There's no reason to believe the Nikon would be lower noise. In fact, there's
reason to suspect it would be higher noise. I don't recall anyone here ever
saying they didn't want anything more than the D. Not only do you whine, you
grow your own grapes.
Paul
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Some of you seem to think this is the Pentax Lovers List vs. a discussion
> list.
>
> I find it interesting.
>
> Some of us have compained that Pentax did not have an upgrade offering to
> the *istD. That was met with claims that the *ist D does everything they
> want, 6.1MP gave images with all the quality they wanted, why would we want
> something more?
>
> Now that a successor has been announced, many of those same people have
> already got in line to purchase one when it's released.
>
> For me at least, I don't plan to throw any more money into Pentax. A lot of
> the photography I enjoy doing is night shots, including quite shortly
> astrophotography. Therefore a lower noise at higher ISO camera would be of
> great benefit.
>
> Canon and Nikon are successful for a reason.
>
> The pissing and moaning and whining as it's been labeled, is an expression
> of an opinion. It seems many here only want to hear one side of things.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: Some more new camera speculation
> >Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:28:53 +0100
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>You folks just love hearing yourselves piss and moan. It's embarrassing to
> >>even listen to it.
> >
> >That ought to be in the Pentax quotations for 2006, and no smiley this
> >time.
> >
> >Well put Godfrey.
> >
> >Jostein
> >
>
>
