> fra: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 17 Feb 2006 at 6:23, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock house > > that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have > > hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How could > > that be? > > There's no need to be condescending, if 6MP images are good enough for you > and > your stock house/magazine publishers that's great, you've got just the tool > to > do the job but it doesn't mean that it's good enough for everyone.
My stock house had some limitationswhich in practice set the lower limited to 8MP a couple of years ago, but they've got some new software that make this less important. The lady who runs the stock house is a former photo editor from one of Norways largest publishers, so I think she knows something about what is regarded as "good enough" for the costumers. DagT
