Not a reply specifically to Mark's comment, but to the thread in general. I read the article and remember reading that all of the cameras were judged capable of eaisly making excellent images up to 11x14.
For all practical purposes, any of the differences in image quality will be swamped out by whatever you do with photoshop, the paper used to print the image, and all the other steps of the process on the way to the print. It's probably hard to sell a magazine with headline that says "Five cameras tested, they're virtually identical, it won't make much difference which one you pick!!!!" See you later, gs <http://georgesphotos.net>
