> I mainly bought the 16-45 (over the FAJ 18-35, since the DA 18-55mm was not > yet available) for its 16mm end. Then I compared the DA 16-45 to the 18-55 > and I find the former to be better, especially at wider end. > Dario
I'm still a bit worried about my 16-45. One pic seems decently sharp, another not. Could be me, could be my sharpening methods, or the fall last year. I think i'll send in the camera and lens for them to look at. I do want to use it for Snow Golf again Feb 25th, so i'll wait till then. istD and A28mm made a good combo last year. Dave > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "dick graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:34 PM > Subject: DA 16-45 lens > > > > How good is the DA 16-45 lens? Is it worth the extra $ purchasing this > > over the 18-55 or would the FA 24-90 be a better choice? > > > > DG > > >
