> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/07 Tue PM 11:45:50 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT: Helmut Newton > > "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not > >> photography is "art". Far as I'm concerned it is and that's > >> "settled law". Helmut's "answer" is a bit oblique for me and > >> since you don't disagree, care to comment further? Thanks! > > > >Define "art" > > You can't. That's *why* it shouldn't be used! ;-) > > BTW: The local supermarket now has a device with which they can take > your digital image file and "print" it on a cake in colored icing. So > "good taste" *can* be discussed with regards to photography. > Hmmmm. Not sure about that. Although the one "I" produced created much hilarity, so could be said to have gone down well in one sense, the cake was bloody awful.
m ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
