More than one PDMLer wrote: "Dear Jackass"? Are you sure?
I think you should distinguish between people who wrote to say that the
thing was not as well organised as it might have been, and those who were
"vulgar and aggressive".
I think you should also recognise that the whole thing was badly handled,
and stop defending it by claiming that people here were to blame for the
scheme being abandoned. If it had been a good scheme, it would have
sailed over a few nasty letters.
John
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:05:44 -0000, Aaron Reynolds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 4:56 PM, John Forbes wrote:
An apology for that is in order (though perhaps not for Mr Jackass, who
I suspect wasn't a PDMLer anyway).
Far more than one person. A cursory search of the PDML archive shows
that a few of them have posted to the PDML, though they are not names I
recognize from the olden days.
-Aaron
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
