I'm now beginning to think that the second Notre Dame is not Notre Dame.
In which case, it might be a pano.
John
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:27:27 -0000, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 6 Feb 2006 at 9:48, John Forbes wrote:
Looking at it again, I don't think it is a proper panorama. Not only is
Notre Dame much further away when it appears on the right of the
picture,
but it is taken from a different angle, and a very different viewpoint.
This is actually a panoramic collage, in my view.
I'm of the opinion that it is 360 degree panorama, it stitches
flawlessly and
the in the QTVR player the curved horizon'tals in the jpg image end up
being
rendered ruler straight.
My bet is it's shot from the top of the building adjacent Notre Dame on
Rue du
Cloitre-Notre-Dame, looking from here through 360degrees using Google
Earth
reveals a similar scape.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
