Now I'm confused. Rob keeps telling us that the 6.1 megapixel sensor
can't come close to supporting the resolution of high-end Pentax
lenses. Now I hear that a ten megapixel sensor will exceed the
capability of the lenses. Is the threshold level somewhere in between?
All I know is the *istD delivers great results, and I would guess that
a ten megapixel camera will deliver even better results.
Paul
On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
If the Pentax lenses I have now work well on the Pentax *ist DS (and
they do), I cannot imagine why they would work poorly on an Olympus
4/3 sensor.
I gathered, but it is hearsay from memory, that most OM lenses are
simply not sharp enough on the 4/3's sensor. It is both smaller and
higher resolution. It might not be true: that's why I said to test
for yourself :o)
I consider the Olympus OM system lenses to be comparable to same-era
Pentax lenses of like focal lengths, at least with respect to
resolution and contrast, rectilinear correction. If it were true that
the OM lenses aren't sharp enough for the E system sensor, it's likely
true that the Pentax lenses aren't either.
Interesting conjecture:
The E-330 4/3 format sensor has approximately 174.2 pixels per mm.
There's been a lot of talk here and elsewhere about wanting an uprated
D model with 8-10Mpixel. If you take the same pixel density and put it
on the Sony-dimension chip it comes out to 4094 x 2735 pixels, or 10.6
Mpixel.
So if Pentax releases a 10Mpixel version of the *ist D, will the
Pentax lenses be adequate to deliver the kind of performance that its
sensor can achieve?
Seems like a case of "damned if you don't but damned if you do" to me.
;-)
Godfrey
