Something I didn't notice until I looked at the picture a second time was the (balcony?) handrail it is mounted on. Once I realized that, the scale of the sign mentally snapped in place for me.
The first time I saw the picture, though, I thought the sign was much, much larger, perhaps 4x. Shel, maybe you need to consider a career as a porn photographer? ;) Kidding aside, it's altogether a frame well done. Tim On 2/2/06 7:43, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Yeah, it's about 4-feet across, maybe even a bit more. Perhaps a shot of > it showing more of the building on which it's hanging would be helpful to > give it a better sense of size and place. To be honest, I was more > interested in grabbing a graphic look than making a documentary shot. > Didn't pay attention to my own advice of shooting more frames from more > perspectives ;-(( > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Bruce Dayton > >> Hello Shel, >> >> My comment is that this is a fun, amusing picture to look at. I wish >> I had a better sense of scale. It seems like a rather large signish >> thing. Thanks for sharing it with us. > >> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/ortho.html > > > >
