I'll try to isolate some part of it and see if that works. Thanks.
Cheers, Gautam On 1/30/06, keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gautam Sarup wrote: > > > Ken is it totally off or do you think something could be > > done to give it some appeal? > > > > Thanks, > > Gautam > > Ken has touched on the reeason for it's lack of appeal, but I think a > clarification might be in order. > Too late with the current image, but for later shots, you might find a > way to increase the depth of field to put the entire carving in focus. > There are a lot of "elements" to that piece of art, and it will only be > interesting to see it in person, or for it to be all in focus. > Even as it is, I found myself finding new interesting objects to look > at, but since they were not quite sharp, interest fades... > > Some subjects are very difficult to portray in a photograph, simply > because of their complexity. This may be one of those. Interesting to > look at in person, but how it affects you then won't be captured on film... > > This may be one of those! > > Just my 2ยข -- > > keith whaley > > > > On 1/28/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. > >> > >>Kenneth Waller > > > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: PESO: no name > >> > >> > >> > >>>No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 > >>>and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown. > >>> > >>>Comments are welcome. > >>> > >>>http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>>Gautam > >
