Thanks for the comments Derby. I think it might be useful to me to take a picture with a soft lens to see what it actually looks like vs the same picture using a normal lens. I might take up an offer that was made by a member to let me borrow one.

The gaussian blur is only a layer that is partially contributing to the final image. I might try adding a series of layers with varying degrees of contribution from each.

rg


Derby Chang wrote:
Gonz wrote:

Oops wrong pic.  It should have been:

http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg


Gonz wrote:

Another one with a similar technique as "Soft", easier to do in PS.


http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksoftaprox.jpg

Comments welcome.

rg




I like "k2" much more than "k", which seems a little flat to me. k2 has a lovely waking from a dream quality. Pretty girl, too. I also prefer to use Gaussian blur to Lens blur for this sort of thing. Lens blur tries to mimic iris shapes, but for me, the ideal bokeh needs a perfectly round aperture, hence smooth blurring

D


--
Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man?
- Mitch Hedberg

Reply via email to