Thanks for the comments Derby. I think it might be useful to me to take
a picture with a soft lens to see what it actually looks like vs the
same picture using a normal lens. I might take up an offer that was
made by a member to let me borrow one.
The gaussian blur is only a layer that is partially contributing to the
final image. I might try adding a series of layers with varying degrees
of contribution from each.
rg
Derby Chang wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
Gonz wrote:
Another one with a similar technique as "Soft", easier to do in PS.
http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksoftaprox.jpg
Comments welcome.
rg
I like "k2" much more than "k", which seems a little flat to me. k2 has
a lovely waking from a dream quality. Pretty girl, too. I also prefer to
use Gaussian blur to Lens blur for this sort of thing. Lens blur tries
to mimic iris shapes, but for me, the ideal bokeh needs a perfectly
round aperture, hence smooth blurring
D
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I
was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's
a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man?
- Mitch Hedberg
- Re: PESO - Soft part deux (corrected url) Gonz
-