My $.02, as if they matter...
The PUG should continue requiring that either the body or lens be Pentax.
A size change is desirable.
I'm not opposed to there being a 3rd section of the gallery each month -
Non-Pentax gear.
Tom C.
From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:58:43 +0100 (CET)
>Reading all the comments in this thread has given me pause for thought.
I
>now feel that the PUG should stay as it is wrt equipment, although I'm
>still in support of an agreed upon increase in file dimensions and size.
Exactly how I feel about it.
I have submitted dozens of images to the PUG over the last years,
and apart from the image-size I have no problems with 'the rules' ...
Regards, JvW
Looking forward to the Januari PUG :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
