For a short time a few years back, we had a half dozen volunteers who
each commented on a number of photos for each PUG. It was a discussion
starter and led to more comments. I thought it was a pretty nice way of
developing some dialogue, but it was canceled after just a few months.
I wouldn't mind seeing a return to that and would again volunteer to
comment.
Paul
On Jan 29, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Hardly anyone pays any attention to the PUG or bothers to comment
onthe entries. Why should people bother?
On 1/29/06, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> As others have
observed, PUG submissions are significantly> down as compared to
previous years. While I'm sure that> a lot of this is because of the
upsurge in PAW/PESO/...,> I really don't feel this is the time to make
it harder to> submit to the PUG.>> It's my belief that the restrictive
rules (only Pentax gear> for the PUG, but anything goes for a PAW)
contributes in no> small way to the decreasing significance of the
PUG, and if> any change were proposed I'd suggest just dropping the
rule.> It's not as if we expect the PUG to be overrun by submissions>
from outsiders, after all. I'd like to see the best work from> any of
the list members, no matter what camera they were using> that day.>>
