Looks like I'm the only dissenting voice, and I haven't contribute to the PUG for quite a while. However...
This is a Pentax list, yes? Why would anyone want to display pics, in the PUG or as a link from an email posted to the list, that were shot using equipment other than Pentax? If I post a link to a web page of mine containing an all-Canon image, then I label it as OT because it is off topic, because it seems the sensible thing to do, not because anyone has ever told me that this is how it must be done. I remember a few years ago there being some discussion about what equipment qualifies a shot for the PUG. Someone asked about a Ricoh body with a Pentax lens, and the general consensus was that it was to be allowed. This list, although owned, is effectively unmoderated, and as such develops as a community with general agreement by contributors on the way it is run. I dare say that if the majority feeling is that any gear should be allowed for the PUG, then that is what will happen, but for my part it seems plain daft. It's a Pentax list. Show Pentax pictures. Talk about Pentax gear. QED. .02 Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
