> > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/01/25 Wed AM 04:32:34 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25 > > On 24 Jan 2006 at 21:35, mike wilson wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > No, but it's enough to reproduce a film "look." While a digital > > > recreation of a Kocacolor or Velvia or what-have-you look may not > > > replicate every color the same way the film would, the overall look and > > > feel can be duplicated quite easily. Extreme technical accuracy isn't > > > necessary in order to achieve the aesthetic value. > > > Paul > > > > Er, no. I've not yet seen a ditial system that can reproduce the > > projection of a Kodchrome 25 slide. > > Hold onto your hats, they're coming (if not just around the corner or you > could > say as real as a P645D) > > http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/4864 > > Current solutions: > > http://www.panoramtech.com/products/facility.html > > You didn't mention cost.. > Cost is (for quality comparison puposes) immaterial. I've seen some of the most expensive systems and they don't match up. Even when they do reach that stage I don't expect the cost to be comparative, or even attainable in my case, for some considerable time.
m > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
