Jens Bladt wrote:
No, Im not shure. You may very well be right. Anyone else tried this with
the "D"?


I have. The same backfocusing problem appears with my 85 1.4 lens. The autofocus is pretty much dead on. When I manually focus, its about the same as you are getting. Its maddening.


Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. december 2005 01:06
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8


You sure that your viewfinder and sensor distances are equal?  Could be
that one needs to be adjusted.

Jens Bladt wrote:


I did that I few days ago. Focusing at 10 inch (centre of the view

finder) -

the 11 inch mark (further away from me) was sharp. I shot that test from
appr. 2-3 meters distance witrh the  FA 2.8/80-200mm.

Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. december 2005 00:18
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8





Hello Jens,

My personal feeling is that the sensor area is larger than we would
like to think.  Achieving AF within the sensor bounderies (not visible
to us) is all the system is going to do.



An intersting, though mostly useless exercise is to take a picture of a
ruler that is at an angle to the camera, and see where the focus is in
relation to the chosen focus point.

William Robb










--
When you're worried or in doubt,
    Run in circles, (scream and shout).




--
Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man?
- Mitch Hedberg

Reply via email to