Pentax is what, around 4-6 months behind the gun right now in coming out with a body that competes on a par with the low-end Canon (I honestly haven't paid enough attention to know what Nikon's doing)? You can bet though, that most consumers with $1K to spend on a DSLR, will opt for an 8MP model over a 6MP model.

Which is why there's a rumored 9mp model, based on a Pentax *ist-Ds2/L body soon to be released. Probably using the Samsung name, (we've seen images), and maybe as a Pentax as well. I now begin to believe that there will actually be a New *istD2, sooner rather than later, probably with a 12-13mp APS sensor, maybe even with in body anti shake technology, or 1.3x crop factor, or <gasp> maybe both.

Tom C wrote:

From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The majority of the digital market is and always will be Consumer Electronics, the camera market is by and large a side-show for even the low-end DSLR's.


I can't argue with that.

Based on the premise (true or not) then, that most digital camera purchasers are not *seriously* into photography as a hobby or profession, and are merely consumers with expendable income, does that bode well for our favorite company producing serious equipment? By "serious" I mean, gear that competes on a par with it's competitors at the same time as it's competitors. I know there's the 645 digital, but that will never be a mainstream product.

Pentax is what, around 4-6 months behind the gun right now in coming out with a body that competes on a par with the low-end Canon (I honestly haven't paid enough attention to know what Nikon's doing)? You can bet though, that most consumers with $1K to spend on a DSLR, will opt for an 8MP model over a 6MP model.

Anyway, I'm not trying to be anti-Pentax. I don't know what the future holds. I'm just saying there's more than one way to view the developments.

Tom C.





--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Reply via email to