Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 2006-01-14, at 18:52, DagT wrote: > >> The DA40mm does cover FF and the 16-45 too above a focal length >> (does anybody know about the 50-200?) and thus the required >> movements of the sensor is small. > >AFAIR when I tried DA 40 with MZ-5N I saw heavy vignetting in the >viewfinder. Where's the truth then?
Darby Chang tested the DA 40 on a film camera and posted the results on the web (I forget where). The results showed some fall-off in the corners when wide open (about 1 stop, IIRC), but not worse than a lot of standard lenses when wide open. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
