Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 11.01.06 16:28: > As it should be ... the Software is really what matters. Given near > equal capabilities, the hardware matters not at all. I would happily > run Linux rather than Windows if Apple tanked (fat chance ... Apple > stock outperformed Google this past year) ... Windows gives me a > headache: it gets in the way of doing what I want the computer to do > more times than not. True. I'm not a die hard fan of Apple, but just after working for 12 years with Mac OS computers I can say that I have always liked the way it works much better than Windows. I just hope that "universal" applications will be available a little longer than "fat" ones as it was during m68k -> Power PC change. Their marketing is strange too - it was not so long ago when they showed superiority of RISC based Power PC processors over old, still somewhat influenced by 8086 Intel CPUs. Now it is just contrary situation.
> Updates to universal binaries for Apple's pro apps will cost $49 > each. Knowing how this works, that's near to cost recovery for the > packaging, shipping and media. They could provide online updates for free :-) -- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
