Pal, I hesitate to continue this conversation because
it really is silly and because I've been wanting to
write a post about Eudora Welty, a brilliant writer
who died this week and who was also an gifted amateur
photographer.
You're wrong to accuse either Mike or me of having
written or implied that pro=good and non-pro=bad.
What we said was pro=lots of pros use 'em (for the
reasons Mike detailed), non-pro=very few do (ditto).
Quality, in and of itself, was not at issue.
We can all think of good non-pro cameras, for
instance, the many K1000s soon to enter their third
decade of problem-free service.
We all agree that the MZ-S is a good camera, that
Pentax makes good lenses, and that any pro can take
pretty pictures with them.
On to Welty. --John
Pal wrote:
>>John wrote:
>>Why do you care?
>I care because the myth that Pentax doesn't offer pro
>gear or pro service is just that; a myth.
=====
John Edwin Mason
Charlottesville, Virginia
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alt email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
