On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote: > >The Mustang GT MSRP is ~$28k > > Except for the "first on the block crowd", most buyers pay substantially less > than sticker for a "Big Three" vehicle.
Not for a Mustang GT. It's always excluded from the special dealer incentives, etc. (in fact even the regular Mustang is generally excluded from those offers), and isn't discounted; dealers don't discount cars when they can sell everything on their lot at a non-discount price. For the first-on-the-block crowd there can be a significant dealer markup applied. As far as I know the same is true for those other "image" vehicles from the rest of the Big Three. > > Interestingly, GM recently announced they would adjust down their sticker > prices to be more realistic relative to actual sale price. > Now if @ this new lower level, GM vehicles still don't sell, what will GM do. > Rebates? Red tag sales? > > Kenneth Waller > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: Re: PESO: New Dodge Challenger > > > >John Francis wrote: > >> > >> I can assure you you're wrong on this point. > >> How do I know? Because a 2006 Mustang GT > >> is on my short list of cars to consider as > >> a replacement for my 1986 Mustang GT. > >> > >> The Mustang GT Coupe comes in well under $30K, > >> even with a good list of additional features. > >> A GT convertible with the top interior option > >> package plus the interior trim upgrade is $32K. > >> > >> > >Ok, I stand corrected. The Mustang GT MSRP is ~$28k. So mid-$30s was > >wrong. Now just add some tax... title it.... "dealer prep"... > >"destination charges".... :-) The only thing worse than buying a car > >is buying a house. > > > >-- > > > >Christian > >http://photography.skofteland.net > > > > > ________________________________________ > PeoplePC Online > A better way to Internet > http://www.peoplepc.com
