Fair enough, although I didn't consider it unfair or ill-considered, although it may have been. I was just wondering why/how you came to that conclusion. No apology needed, but graciously accepted.
Shel (still curious) > [Original Message] > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 1/9/2006 6:05:44 AM > Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > Shel, > > That was an unfair, ill-considered reaction on my part. > Apologies. > > Jack > > > > > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jack, > > > > Why would you assume that? I'd not posted to the thread before, and > > my views were not made public. IAC, you're forgiven ;-)) > > > > Shel > > > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Jack Davis > > > > > Forgive me, but I had already assumed that. > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > --- Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > > > Let me just register my non-support. > > > > I'm fully in accord with Bob > > > > Walkden's statements and others that > > > > take the same position. > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl.yahoo.com
