Still, its the shop owner's responsibility to consider those points and to react as he sees fit. "Guilty by association" has a life of its own.
Jack --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And if you've ever been accused yourself, falsely or otherwise, one > quickly > learns that "innocent until proven guilty" is pretty much a televison > and > elementary school sham. The majority of the power rests in the > established > authority (the government, police, and other "arms of the law"). If > that > wasn't so, the accused wouldn't have to PROVE their innocence. > > If the person's guilty they will likely be punished. If they are > innocent, > they don't need anyone making the job of defense, or their own lives, > harder > for them. > > It's also good to remember that even though the guy is angry at being > turned > in, you likely don't know exactly what he is guilty of doing, if > anything. > If you did, you would likely be guilty by complicity. > > Tom C. > > > > > >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > >Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:51:41 -0500 > > > >I've found that unless someone has been placed in jeopardy, it's > best to > >mind one's own business. As others have said, "innocent until proven > > >guilt." > >Paul > >On Jan 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > >>Kevin, > >>Understand your dilemma, but even though you don't know yet "who is > >>working for him", due to this photo related situation, I'd let the > >>owner know before too many others make the connection. > >>Are you certain this is the same person and that the owner won't > fain > >>shock and surprise? > >> > >>Jack > >> > >>--- Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>I recently walked into a large Sydney camera store and ventured to > >>>the > >>>"pro section" to purchase some Fuji Provia. I was astounded that > the > >>>person serving me was an ex-photog who is currently in the midst > of > >>>a child porn investigation. He worked with his uncle who has been > >>>charged > >>>and a trial is due. > >>> > >>>My question is, should I make the store owner aware of who is > working > >>>for him? > >>>Am I being vigilant or is it sheer bloody mindedness on my part? > >>>Is this really none of my business? > >>>I must admit this sort of thing boils my blood quickly. > >>> > >>>Kind regards > >>>Kevin > >>> > >>>-- > >>>"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for > lunch. > >>> > >>>Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>__________________________________________ > >>Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > >>Just $16.99/mo. or less. > >>dsl.yahoo.com > >> > > > > > > > __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
