I believe that's correct. I looked into this back when the DL first hit the streets, and I'm pretty sure that was what I found. I think there is also one minor change in the private metadata, but for most purposes DL raw files (and, I'd guess, DS2 files) are identical to those from the DS.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:04:19PM -0500, Adam Maas wrote: > It's probably just the Camera tagging, as the DL and DS2 will be tagged > DL or DS2 rather than DS. This was a problem with D70s RAW's in the spring. > > -Adam > > > > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > >I didn't know that they changed .PEF format for the DL body. I'd like > >to know more... > > > >If you have a DL .PEF file that you don't mind sharing, can you post > >it somewhere that I can retrieve it with ftp or http? > > > >thanks! > >Godfrey > > > >On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:54 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote: > > > >>Hi all, > >> > >>Yesterday I took some RAW shots with an *istDL. Now I've seen that > >>neither Photobrowser nor Rawshooter Essentials support such file > >>format. > >> > >>Am I wong? Has anyone converted such RAW files with one of obove > >>softwares? > >> > >>Any update for the DL from Pentax anywhere? > >> > >>Please don't tell me to use ACR. I don't have CS2 and I like > >>Rawshooter Essentials, so much that I'm considering updating to > >>Premium (supposed to support the DL). > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>Dario > >
