On 29 Dec 2005 at 19:35, Kevin Waterson wrote:

> I really only have the Hasselblad H1 to compare this to and when it comes 
> down to 
> bang for bucks, this one really has everybody in second place. I guess with 
> the only
> 16mp full frame 35mm sensor on the market they can charge what they like for 
> them.
> The camera with 70-200mm f2.8 lens swings in at about AUD $15,000.00 but 
> compared to
> the Hasselblad at about AUD $40,000.00 it really offers alot of bang for you 
> bucks.
> Even though the blad is a MF camera, this really does compete and will 
> certainly be
> at the forefront of alot of photographers shopping lists. I can see journo's 
> and
> wedding photographers looking for this en-masse.
> 
> If pentax is considering joining the MF Digital market then I think they 
> really need
> to be looking at starting their sensor size at least better than the 
> oppositions 35mm
> offering. I am still holding in there with pentax to early in the new year.

I think you are being far too practical :-)

You have confirmed what I imagined would be the case when a practical 
comparison was made between these two systems. I also expect that the 5D will 
make a dent in sales of the 1DS MkII, it's enough camera for most people and 
inexpensive enough for a pro that they might even consider buying two or three 
bodies.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to