On Dec 23, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

Cost and Size are an issue, but operating expenses are lower on the 4800 and up, unless you plan on swapping matte and photo black inks on a regular basis. The up-front ink cost is big, but the 110ml and 220ml carts are far less expensive per ml than the small 10-20ml carts in the 2400. If you print seriously. the ink cost alone may justify the price difference between the R2400 and the 4800.

For the volume and sizes I print, I calculated that the 4800 would cost me 10% more to operate compared to the R2400. If I printed full- bleed 13x19 and up more frequently, yes, it would cost less.

Godfrey

Reply via email to