On 10/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: >I don't mind if I am not cut out for street photography, I was just trying to >see if the closer is better premise worked or had limits or anything. A >rather nonscientific test because the photo may not have been the best >for that. So >it may not prove anything. But I was curious. > >I have my own conclusions about things, street photography and what I like to >shoot and why. <g>
Er, your 'street photography' is fine. Crop 1 is a good shot and stands up well to anything I've ever seen. It's not any better or any worse than a photograph of a person (obviously) at close proximity to the camera. It is irrelevant IMO where the subject was in relation to the camera when the exposure happened. The finished image is all that matters to me. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
