Yes, but my point is that you're comparing two different cameras in two
different classifications and finding the lower level camera wanting.
As if it were the camera's fault. If I paid approximately $3000 for the
*ist-D I'd expect considerably higher performance from it when capturing
images as well. I didn't and for the difference I can buy a second
body, or more lenses. People are happy with my photographs, they buy my
prints. I sold enough at my last show to pay for my consumables in
mounting it. Sounds to me that's what you're doing. If you choice
works for you I happy for you.
Herb Chong wrote:
i've been willing to pay the price for more than a year.
Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: Fall in the Adirondacks
At a price well above the *ist-D...
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
